Mutual fund trigger: Should you activate it?

Prasoon was on cloud nine when he saw NAV of his MF scheme; it was doubled. But his joy didn't last long as the market plunged...

Mutual fund trigger: Should you activate it?

Presentation on Mutual Fund

Check out this SlideShare Presentation:

Presentation on Mutual Fund

View more presentations from Amar Ranu.

Home Loan war is on!

The home loan war just seems to be getting intensive with major domestic lenders such as SBI, ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank and others jumping into the bandwagon. The situation reminds a similar event seen in 2003 when foreign banks lined up to provide home loan at 6 per cent for first 2 to 3 years followed by floating rates unlike 7 to 8 per cent provided by their private and PSU counterparts. ICICI Bank and Kotak Mahindra Bank took the fight further with the announcement of new rates so called ‘teaser rates’. Kotak Mahindra Bank has announced the special offer of 8.49 per cent for 30 months for all loan categories followed by the interest rate linked to retail prime linked rate in subsequent years. Similarly, ICICI Bank offers home loan at 8.25per cent for first two years followed by rates linked to in house built Floating Reference Rate (FRR) in subsequent years. Earlier this year, State Bank of India (SBI), the largest lender in India has launched ‘SBI Easy Loan’ offering home loans at 8 per cent for first year, 8.5 per cent for next two years followed by interest rates linked to State Bank Advance Rate (SBAR). HDFC, an another big lender in home loan segment which once described these moves as ‘teaser rates’ also announced a fixed cum floating scheme where it offers home loans at 8.25 per cent for first three years followed by interest rate linked to retail prime lending rates in subsequent years. However, this time they have given out different reasons such as ample liquidity, improved operational efficiency and good quality portfolios among few. So, the question arises what have made these lenders to jump into lucrative home loan segment and which rates are cheapest at the current conditions?

Lucrative home loan portfolio: is it attractive?

In the current economic scenario, the credit growth has almost dried, currently growing at little over 10 per cent down from 20-22 per cent a year earlier. The banks’ credit portfolio which comprised mainly of commercial loans witnessed slow commercial lending due to subdued market conditions and this led to a fall in net interest income, a difference between interest income over interest expenditure. This forced banks to concentrate to home loan borrowers to cover up the losses. Moreover, the real estate boom after a long two year lull added another spark among prospective buyers, thanks to combined home loan sops from lenders and discount offers from builders. Sops to Customers Banks have been offering sops in terms of low interest rates to new customers, just bypassing the existing customers. Initially some banks offered nil or reduced processing and documentation charges but they had scrapped it too. But the question arises, would the teaser rates jeopardize the cash flows of borrowers if the rates arise in future? The answer lies in the effectiveness of borrowers’ planning.

So effectively, the interest rates vary across all the banks at the current BPLR of respective banks which may vary in future as per the interest rate scenario in future.

Are these loans easily available to borrowers?

Simply no! Rupeetalk has interacted with some of the prospective home loan borrowers and many have complained that banks have put stringent norms before sanctioning these teaser loans to them. Some of the norms put are compulsory new home (no 2^nd home buying), compulsory guarantor, no refinancing, listed developers and increased processing time.

Sanjay Bhange, a prospective home loan borrower applied for a home loan with PNB in last Aug 2009 and got sanctioned his home loan in Nov 2009, that too, after repeated reminders along with a warning for complaint in consumer forum.

The logic is simple: have patience, check the listed developers with them, arrange the guarantor in advance and get all your documents ready before applying for these new home loan schemes.

What can the regulator do?

To some extent, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been successful in creating a positive competition among banks to offer low interest rates to borrowers as banks were initially reluctant to pass the monetary policy benefits given by RBI to them. Currently, the RBI in consultation with a special committee has been working to float a new benchmark rate applicable for all home loan borrowers (old and new). So, in near future, the home loan borrowers will have the ease to select the bank on the basis of services provided.

Is Social Impact/Value Creation Key to Microfinance’s Commercial Success?

All organizations create value in terms of economic, social and environmental components. The aim is value creation in terms of improved social surroundings. Microfinance institutions started their work on a social platform and needed to grow in order to deliver on its potential to reduce poverty. All microfinance programs target one thing in common: human development which is geared towards both the economic and social uplift of the people they cater for. It needs to scale up rapidly to reach out to poor in large numbers, it must realize its potential as a broad platform and social environment and it must tap the commercial financing to achieve the first two goals.

No doubt the grass is growing rapidly. Microfinance has been establishing new norms of behavior and cultivating a new level of trust. Like any other emerging industry, microfinance has grown by leap and bound in last few years and consolidations or tie-ups are inevitable among the top 200-300 microfinance institutions. Commercial banks have begun partnering microfinance institutions in an innovative way where they outsource a majority of lending activities with new and improved technology. In today’s environment, commercial financing represent the largest source of financing. If microfinance has to scale up significantly, it must look beyond its basic social building. In recent developments, microfinance institutions have also extended its lessons to other business opportunities for providing goods and services sought by poor.

So, the question arises: does it confine to just social impact or value creation? May be true or false; true in the sense that the basic concept of microfinance is to bridge the societal gap among poor human beings while false in the sense that it must look out of box to provide continuous cash-flows to needy persons for which it needs capital. Nevertheless, rapid technology growth has made the flow easier enabling maximum people to come in its vicinity.

Today, many microfinance institutions have started tapping commercial financing in order to spread their reach to billions instead of millions. Stakeholders who eye a pie of the microfinance institutions pre-capitalization require an assessment of social impacts, impacts on lifestyle and empowerment issues etc. They also analyze the society as a system and societal impacts, hoow deeply it is connected to the poor people where it has worked and how deeply it has gone in improving their livelihoods.

But the greedy game has followed its own course. There is no denying the fact that the high recovery rates (as high as 96 per cent) have forced commercial lenders to move towards microfinance institutions in order to tap the burgeoning growth in micro-lending. The MFI growth has been diluting the interests of microfinance. For the success of an MFI, rapid growth is not necessary rather how deeply it goes in assessing the societal impacts. The signal is clear: Reach to big numbers without making big bucks. But commercial greedy lenders will surely imbalance the strong pillars of pyramid i.e. microfinance. It may lose its relevance in the years to come. White claims that microfinance is a proven anti-poverty intervention thus seems ambiguous.