Since the SEBI made mandatory for Liquid Fund managers to invest in papers with maturity of up to 91 days only, the Liquid Funds lost sheen among institutional investors due to reduced portfolio returns. This allowed the market participants to shift its focus to Ultra Short Term Funds (erstwhile called as Liquid-Plus Funds). Thanks to superior returns and tax benefits over Liquid Funds, Ultra Short term funds have found a favour among all class of investors.However, the market watchdog SEBI still not very confident about the credit stability in the market issued another directive asking all mutual funds to value money market and debt securities with maturity over 91 days (or with maturity up to 182-days) on a mark-to-market basis with effect from July 01, 2010. The ruling will require all fund managers to factor in any movement in securities prices on a daily basis to calculate the Net Asset Value (NAV) of fund. The new valuation method may increase the volatility of Ultra Short Term Funds while Liquid Funds being shorter tenure funds will be less volatile. Currently securities having maturities over 182 days are already valued at daily weighted average (mark-to-market) method. The move will ensure that the Liquid Funds and Ultra Short Term Funds are undeniably liquid by asking them to be valued in a more transparent manner.
Ultra short term schemes which comprise 40 per cent of Indian Mutual Fund industry’s asset under management (AUM) of Rs. 7.59 lakh crore have been fetching returns in the range of 5-5.5 per cent having an edge over its sibling Liquid Funds fetching returns in the range of 4-4.25 per cent. The debt instruments held by Ultra Short Term Funds (or Liquid-Plus Funds) have a longer tenure i.e. the average maturity of these funds is comparatively higher than that of Liquid Funds. Long term papers (over 91 days) help fund managers to generate extra returns over short term papers (up to 91 days). Recently the RBI hiked the CRR by 75 basis points which increased the returns on Commercial Papers and Certificate of Deposits by around 100-150 basis points.
In the last few months, there have been continuous net outflows from Liquid Funds due to high dividend tax structure and restrictions to invest in papers having maturities up to 91 days only. Liquid Funds charge a dividend distribution tax (DDT) of 28 per cent unlike in Ultra Short Term Funds where the DDT is 14 per cent for individual and 22 per cent for corporate, thus, clearly giving a tax advantage of 8 per cent. Treasury Officials, CFOs etc prefer Liquid Funds and Ultra-Short Term Funds over Banks’ Fixed Deposits where interest income is charged at 33 per cent.
By issuing out the current directive, the regulator SEBI wants to make sure that the Oct 2008 Credit Crisis is not repeated where the RBI has to open a lending window for Mutual Funds for a limited period to ease out the crisis. However, the industry will continue to enjoy additional returns in Ultra Short Term Funds, though at a slightly higher risk as long as the tax-arbitrage is in existence over Liquid Funds and banks’ Fixed Deposits. The market will actively watch the upcoming Annual Budget on Feb 27, 2010 where the government may take away the tax arbitrage in Ultra Short Term Funds to make sure that Banks’ FDs are actively used for placing excessive unused funds, thus, bringing out a kind of stability in the credit market.
